University social responsability strategies and environmental sustainability for Colombian SMEs

Main Article Content

Dean Fidel Castro
Editorial Mundo Interdisciplinario
Amalio Segundo Otero Tapia
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Abstract

This reflection paper aims to analyze the relationship between university social responsibility (USR) strategies and environmental sustainability in Colombian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), considering the economic, social, and ecological challenges of the contemporary context. The research was conducted through a qualitative methodology based on documentary review and reflective analysis of scientific literature published between 2015 and 2024 in indexed databases such as Scopus, Dialnet, Redalyc, SciELO, and Latindex. The results  show  that the  articulation  between  universities  and   SMEs promotes  knowledge transfer, strengthens organizational capacities, and facilitates the implementation of sustainable practices focused on environmental protection and business competitiveness. Likewise, universities play a strategic role in promoting social innovation, environmental education, and sustainable territorial development. It is concluded that university social responsibility constitutes a fundamental mechanism for promoting environmental sustainability processes in Colombian SMEs through training strategies, applied research, and collaboration with productive sectors. Therefore, the integration between academia and business represents an opportunity to build sustainable, resilient, and inclusive development models in the Colombian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite

Castro, D. F., & Otero Tapia, A. S. (2025). University social responsability strategies and environmental sustainability for Colombian SMEs. Enfoque Disciplinario, 10(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.70165/enfdis.v10i2.314

Section

Artículos
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The guiding principle of Creative Commons licenses is creative freedom. This system complements copyright law without opposing it, recognizing its importance within our culture. The content of the articles is the sole responsibility of each author and does not, in any way, commit the journal or the institution. The dissemination and reproduction of titles, abstracts, and full content are permitted for academic, scientific, and cultural purposes, provided that the corresponding source is properly cited. This work may not be used for commercial purposes.

Licencia de Creative Commons

References

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2020). Conceptos de administración estratégica. Pearson.

De La Hoz Suárez, A., Urzola Berrío, H., & De La Hoz Suárez, B. (2021). Gestión operativa ante evento disruptivo covid-19 en comercializadoras de productos ferreteros, construcción, del hogar en Sincelejo. Conocimiento Global, 6(S1), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.70165/cglobal.v6iS1.141

Drucker, P. (2017). Management challenges for the 21st century. Routledge.

Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line”. Harvard Business Review, 2(1), 1–5.

Freeman, R. E. (2015). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

García-Morales, V., Martín-Rojas, R., & Lardón-López, M. (2018). Influence of social responsibility on organizational performance. Sustainability, 10(4), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041349

Gómez, L., & Rodríguez, J. (2020). Sostenibilidad empresarial y competitividad en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 55(3), 112–129.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2019). Dirección de marketing. Pearson.
Méndez, C. (2019). Metodología de la investigación científica. McGraw-Hill.

Mintzberg, H. (2018). Strategy safari. Free Press.

Moreno, A., & Correa, M. (2022). Responsabilidad social empresarial en pequeñas empresas colombianas. Revista Colombiana de Administración, 18(2), 56–74.

ONU. (2020). Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Naciones Unidas.

Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2019). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62–77.

Robbins, S., & Coulter, M. (2021). Administración. Pearson.

Rosado Botello, J., Madero Casadiego, A., & Severiche Sierra, C. (2022). Comportamientos de las organizaciones frente a la sostenibilidad ambiental: contexto indígena Wayuu, La Guajira colombiana. Enfoque Disciplinario, 7(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.70165/enfdis.v7i1.275

Sánchez Castillo, V., Peláez Rodríguez, M., & López de Parra, L. (2021). Valoración del territorio para el fomento del turismo: una aproximación desde los actores en cuestión. Conocimiento Global, 6(2), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.70165/cglobal.v6i2.205

Senge, P. (2017). The fifth discipline. Doubleday.

Viveros Almeida, L., García Ibarra, V., Solarte Solarte, C., & Rivera Vallejo, G. (2021). El Covid-19 desde la perspectiva del emprendedor carchense. Conocimiento Global, 6(S2), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.70165/cglobal.v6iS2.168

World Bank. (2021). Small and medium enterprises and sustainability. World Bank Publications.

Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.

Zarta, P. (2018). La sostenibilidad o sustentabilidad: un concepto poderoso para la humanidad. Tabula Rasa, 28, 409–423. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n28.18